Header graphic for print
Tax Law Roundup current law developments in U.S. taxation

Category Archives: Debt vs. Equity

Subscribe to Debt vs. Equity RSS Feed

IRS Wins Con-Ed LILO Case On Appeal – No Substance to Lease or Debt

Posted in Debt vs. Equity, Economic Substance, Litigation/Controversy, Tax Shelters

In a reversal of the taxpayer-favorable lower court opinion, the Appeals Court for the federal Court of Claims concluded that Consolidated Edison’s Lease-In Lease-Out (LILO) transaction did not have economic substance and the purported lease was not a “true lease”.  The IRS “listed” this particular transaction in Rev. Rul. 2002-69 and Congress further stopped these… Continue Reading

Third Circuit Concludes Historic Rehab Credit Investors Were Not Partners

Posted in Debt vs. Equity, Economic Substance, Partnership/LLC, Real Estate, Tax Credits

The IRS has won a significant victory in the world of tax credit partnerships.  Federal tax credits are typically monetized through syndicated credit-investment partnerships where the investor is required to be treated as a partner for tax purposes in order to receive an allocation of the credit.  In a reversal of the Tax Court, the… Continue Reading

Tax Court Respects Related-Party Loan

Posted in Debt vs. Equity, General, Litigation/Controversy, Partnership/LLC

In a significant taxpayer win, the Tax Court concluded in NA General Partnership v. Commissioner that related-party loans from a U.K. corporation to its controlled U.S. subsidiary were respected as debt, and the U.S. subsidiary was entitled to $932 million of interest deductions.  The original loans were $4 billion in fixed-rate notes and $896 million in floating-rate… Continue Reading

Second Circuit Again Concludes Preferred Investor Was Not A Partner

Posted in Debt vs. Equity, Partnership/LLC, Tax Shelters

In the latest Castle Harbour decision, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has again concluded that a preferred investor was not a partner for tax purposes, denying an allocation of taxable income to the tax-indifferent investor.  In 2004, the District Court originally held that the investor was a partner and the second circuit reversed under… Continue Reading